This Week in Policy – Wrap up for the week of June 23, 2025

Supreme Court Upholds the Affordable Care Act’s Preventative Care Mandates

In a significant ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that mandates insurers cover preventive services—such as cancer screenings and HIV prevention medications—without cost-sharing. The 6-3 decision affirms the constitutionality of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s structure, recognizing its members as “inferior officers” under the supervision of the Health and Human Services Secretary. The decision grants the HHS Secretary significant authority over the Task Force, raising concerns about potential politicization of health recommendations. Leaders should stay informed about any changes in preventive service guidelines that may impact care delivery.

Key Takeaway: The ruling ensures that approximately 150 million Americans with private insurance will maintain access to essential preventive services without out-of-pocket costs, supporting early detection and management of chronic diseases. Hospitals and health systems can continue to provide preventive services without anticipating increased patient financial barriers, which could have led to decreased utilization and adverse health outcomes.

CDC Leadership Hearing Highlights Questions on Independence and Direction

Senators pressed Susan Monarez, nominee to lead the CDC, on her ability to act independently amid controversial decisions by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., including sweeping staffing cuts and the overhaul of the vaccine advisory panel. While Monarez emphasized her commitment to science and public health, she sidestepped questions about Kennedy’s role in recent agency disruptions.

Key takeaways: The uncertainty surrounding the ACIP’s future and its new makeup may delay vaccine schedule guidance that hospitals rely on for infection control and immunization planning. Cuts to CDC programs, including childhood lead investigations, raise concern about continuity in federal public health surveillance and coordination. While Monarez signaled a steadying presence, her reluctance to push back on political interference leaves questions about the CDC’s long-term autonomy and clarity of federal guidance for clinical and operational planning.

 

Senate Ruling Derails GOP Medicaid Cuts, Complicates Tax Plan Timeline

The Senate parliamentarian struck down key healthcare provisions in Republicans’ tax bill, blocking major Medicaid cuts and ACA subsidy rollbacks that were intended to offset President Trump’s proposed tax reductions. The decision removes savings tied to provider tax restrictions, limits on immigrant care funding, and bans on gender-affirming services. GOP leaders say they will follow the ruling, which disrupts their efforts to meet the July 4 deadline.

Key takeaways: The blocked Medicaid and ACA changes may temporarily preserve funding streams for hospitals, especially in states serving low-income and immigrant populations. However, unresolved provisions like Planned Parenthood defunding and the repeal of nursing home staffing mandates still create uncertainty. Health systems should remain alert as shifting federal budget strategies could impact reimbursement rates, care delivery models, and coverage access.

 

Supreme Court Upholds States’ Power to Cut Medicaid Funding to Planned Parenthood

The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that states can block Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood for non-abortion health services like contraception and cancer screenings, effectively ending patients’ ability to sue over provider choice. The decision, which stems from a South Carolina case, is expected to prompt similar actions in other conservative states and restrict access to care for low-income Medicaid recipients who rely on Planned Parenthood for basic services.

Key takeaways: The ruling could increase demand on hospitals and safety-net clinics, especially in states that defund Planned Parenthood. With fewer providers accepting Medicaid, systems may see higher patient volumes for reproductive care, cancer screenings, and chronic disease management. Health leaders should monitor for service disruptions and consider scaling up preventive care access to fill potential gaps in underserved communities.

 

RFK Jr.’s Overhauled Vaccine Panel Targets Thimerosal Despite Scientific Consensus

The newly restructured CDC vaccine advisory panel, led by appointees of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., voted to recommend removing thimerosal-containing flu shots for all age groups, despite longstanding evidence showing the preservative is safe. The move, criticized by public health experts, signals a shift toward anti-vaccine rhetoric within federal decision-making and raises concerns about the integrity of vaccine guidance under Kennedy’s leadership.

Key takeaways: Hospitals and clinics may face increased patient hesitancy and logistical challenges as thimerosal-free vaccine options become the default. The broader distrust seeded by Kennedy’s panel could complicate immunization campaigns, strain provider-patient relationships, and disrupt vaccine procurement strategies. Health systems should prepare for questions from concerned families and reaffirm evidence-based guidance in clinical settings.

 

On the Horizon

Trump Pressures Congress to Pass Tax Bill by July 4 – President Trump is urging lawmakers to approve his signature tax-and-spending package ahead of the self-imposed July 4 deadline. The bill includes sweeping tax cuts and major changes to Medicaid, but faces GOP infighting and a key ruling from the Senate parliamentarian that eliminated a Medicaid funding offset. Senate leaders are eyeing a potential vote as early as Friday. 

Why it matters for hospitals: The bill includes the largest proposed cut to Medicaid since the program’s inception, which could jeopardize coverage for millions of low-income patients. Health systems face heightened uncertainty around reimbursement, state funding structures, and patient volumes if the legislation advances. The July 4 pressure adds urgency, but unresolved cost concerns and shifting vote counts mean hospital leaders must prepare for rapid changes.